Austinn C. Miller, MD1,2*; Abigail E. Watson, BS3*; Marc J. Inglese, MD1,2,3

1University of Central Florida/HCA Healthcare Consortium, Tallahassee, FL, USA
2Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee, Tallahassee, FL, USA
3Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA
* Co-first authors

Conflict of interest: None.
Funding sources: None.
Disclaimer: This research was supported in whole or in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.

Abstract:
Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder most commonly affecting areas rich in sebaceous glands, such as the scalp, face, axilla, and groin. Several factors can precipitate SD development, such as colonization of Malassezia, sebocyte activity, impaired immunity, and environmental influences. Topical antifungals, corticosteroids, and calcineurin inhibitors are the current mainstay treatment of SD. Recent clinical trials have validated the efficacy of non-steroidal roflumilast 0.3% foam for the treatment of SD. In this review, we analyze the safety and efficacy profile of roflumilast 0.3% foam.

Keywords: seborrheic dermatitis, treatment, roflumilast, PDE-4 inhibitor

Introduction

Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder most commonly affecting areas rich in sebaceous glands, such as the scalp, face, axilla, and groin.1 While clinical presentations may differ, typical findings include erythematous, pruritic plaques and patches with a yellow, greasy appearance.1,2 This condition can significantly impact quality of life due to activity limiting symptoms and emotional distress exacerbated by cosmetic ramifications.3 SD affects approximately 5% of the global population, whereas its non-inflammatory counterpart, dandruff, likely impacts closer to 50%.4 Despite such high prevalence, the pathogenesis and exact mechanisms via which these yeasts cause inflammation have yet to be fully elucidated.

Malassezia is a part of the human microbiome, interacting with the innate and acquired skin immune system. Innate immunity plays a critical role in initiating the initial immune response against Malassezia.5 Sensitization to Malassezia can cause a type I hypersensitivity reaction leading to redness, itching, and scaling.6 Further studies point towards Malassezia causing an irritant, non-immunogenic stimulation of the immune system, leading to complement activation and a localized increase in NK1+ and CD16+ cells.7,8

Currently, there are many mainstay treatments for SD. Due to the underlying mechanism of Malassezia proliferation, most commonly topical antifungals are used for long-term treatment and topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors for short-term treatment (Table 1).1 Due to the chronicity of SD, ongoing maintenance therapy is often necessary to achieve low recurrence rates of visible signs of the condition, as well as alleviate associating symptoms, such as pruritus.

Table 1
Roflumilast for the Treatment of Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Review - image

Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors, including roflumilast, represent a significant advancement in the treatment of SD and other inflammatory conditions. These drugs work by inhibiting the PDE-4 enzyme, which plays a role in modulating inflammatory responses by breaking down cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP).9,10 Elevated levels of cAMP result in reduced inflammation, making PDE-4 inhibitors effective in managing various ongoing inflammatory disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma.10 In dermatology, PDE-4 inhibitors have received regulatory approval in the US and Canada for plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, atopic dermatitis and, most recently, SD. They have shown promise in off-label treatment of a myriad of other inflammatory skin conditions. Apremilast is an oral PDE-4 inhibitor FDA-approved for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in patients ≥6 years of age. Crisaborole is a topical PDE-4 inhibitor, currently FDA-approved for atopic dermatitis in patients ≥3 months of age. Roflumilast has also demonstrated safety and efficacy in managing chronic inflammatory skin conditions, with the regulatory approval status in the US and Canada summarized in Table 2. Compared to currently available PDE-4 inhibitors, apremilast and crisaborole, used to treat skin disease, roflumilast has demonstrated greater selectivity and potency.9,10

Table 2

Herein, the review will focus on the treatment of SD with a particular emphasis on roflumilast 0.3% foam.

Mechanism of Action

Roflumilast and its active metabolite (roflumilast N-oxide) are inhibitors of PDE-4.9 Inhibition of PDE-4 leads to an increase in cAMP and subsequent decrease in pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interferon gamma.10

Clinical Trials

Phase 211

The Phase 2a study design was a parallel-group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled randomized clinical trial of once-daily roflumilast 0.3% foam. A total of 226 participants aged 18 or older were enrolled in the 8-week trial conducted at 24 sites in the US and Canada with a clinical diagnosis of SD for a 3-month long duration and affecting less than 20% body surface area, including the scalp, face, trunk, and/or intertriginous areas. Roflumilast 0.3% foam demonstrated a statistically significant increase in treatment success, with 104 participants (73.8%) achieving an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1, compared to its vehicle. At week 8, 50 individuals (35.5%) attained an IGA score indicating clearance, while 54 patients (38.3%) achieved an IGA score signifying almost clear skin. In comparison, the vehicle group exhibited lower rates of improvement, with only 10 patients (15.2%) reaching clearance and 17 patients (25.8%) achieving almost clear status. Roflumilast patients exhibited significantly higher rates of erythema success, defined as an overall erythema score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) plus a 2-grade improvement from baseline, compared to those treated with the vehicle. At weeks 2, 4, and 8, respective absolute differences were 16.6% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 6.4%-24.8%), 25.2% (95% CI: 13.1%-34.9%), and 23.5% (95% CI: 9.6%-35.0%). Similar results were noted for scaling success, defined as overall scaling score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) plus a 2-grade improvement from baseline. Statistically significant differences at weeks 2, 4, and 8: absolute differences were 11.8% (95% CI: -0.3% to 21.8%), 20.4% (95% CI: 6.8%-31.8%), and 28.8% (95% CI: 14.4%-41.0%), respectively. Overall, roflumilast 0.3% foam exhibited good tolerability, with a low occurrence of adverse events.

Phase 312

The Phase 3 trial design was a parallel-group, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, multicenter (50 centers) study with participants aged ≥9 years who were clinically diagnosed with SD affecting up to 20% body surface area, including the scalp, face, trunk, and/or intertriginous areas. 457 patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to roflumilast (n = 304) or vehicle (n = 153). The primary endpoint was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and a ≥2-point improvement from baseline by week 8. The secondary endpoints included IGA success by weeks 2 and 4 and a ≥4-point improvement on the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale score (WI-NRS).

During this 8-week trial, a statistically significant amount of roflumilast treated patients (79.5%) achieved IGA success compared with vehicle (58.0%; P < 0.001). Roflumilast also demonstrated success at weeks 2 and 4, with percentages of IGA success of 43.0% versus 25.7% (P < 0.001) and 73.1% versus 47.1% (P < 0.001). At week 8, a higher percentage of patients treated with roflumilast (62.8%) achieved WI-NRS success compared to those treated with the vehicle (40.6%: P < 0.001), with improvement observed within 48 hours after the first application, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3

Safety and Tolerability

Overall, roflumilast 0.3% foam was well tolerated, and had similar rates of adverse events (AE) as the vehicle. During all phases of the study, there were no treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported as a direct result of roflumilast 0.3% foam treatment.11,12 The most prevalent adverse reactions, observed in ≥1% of subjects across both Phase 2 and Phase 3 study groups included nasopharyngitis (1.5%), nausea (1.3%), and headache (1.1%).11,12 Less frequent AEs included application site pruritus, application site pain, and diarrhea.11,12 There were no significant differences between groups noted in clinical laboratory assessments. Vital signs, body weight, and body mass index indicated no clinically meaningful variations.12 Moreover, evaluations for depression, suicidal ideation, and behavior revealed no safety concerns.12

Contraindications

Contraindications include individuals with a known hypersensitivity to roflumilast or any of the components in the formulation, as this can lead to severe allergic reactions. Additionally, patients with moderate to severe liver impairment (Child-Pugh B or C) should not use roflumilast, as it may exacerbate liver dysfunction.13 The coadministration of roflumilast with systemic CYP3A4 inhibitors or dual inhibitors that inhibit both CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 may increase roflumilast systemic exposure and result in increased adverse reactions.13 It should be noted that no formal drug-drug interaction studies were done with topical roflumilast and these recommendations are based on oral roflumilast, which has a much greater bioavailability.

Regulatory Approval

The roflumilast 0.3% foam formulation was approved by the US FDA in December of 2023 and Health Canada in October 2024 for the treatment of SD in individuals aged ≥9 years.14 The medication is to be applied once daily to the affected areas, with the duration determined by the healthcare provider. One pressurized can of roflumilast 0.3% foam (60 g) contains 3 mg roflumilast per 1 g.

Discussion

Current first-line therapies for SD typically include topical antifungals and topical steroids (Table 1). These treatments are often readily available and affordable, leading to their widespread use. While these are effective in many cases, some individuals require a combination of multiple topicals for control which contributes to patient non-compliance due to complex treatment regimens.4 Moreover, these treatments may be ineffective in some individuals and can be associated with poor tolerability due to various AEs such as local skin reactions, burning, pruritus, and blistering.4

Roflumilast 0.3% foam provides an additional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment option in those who have failed first-line therapies or prefer a once daily treatment regimen. It marks the first regulatory approved medication for SD with a novel mechanism of action in over two decades. This foam is uniquely formulated in a water-based emollient formula without skin irritating fragrances or alcohols such as, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, isopropyl alcohol, or ethanol.14 It is reported to be the first-in-class drug formulated with a novel emulsifier that lacks ceramide stripping properties. The hydrating features of the vehicle itself may add to its therapeutic effect. Moreover, the non-irritating, non-steroidal formula enables use anywhere on the body, including the eyelids and genitalia. The non-greasy foam formulation lends itself to use on hairy scalps.

Roflumilast may improve adherence and tolerance due to its once daily application, potent formulation, and minimal AEs. Its greater selectivity for PDE-4 than apremilast and crisaborole, likely contributes to its low side effect profile. Few patients reported stinging, burning, application site reactions, or application site pain with roflumilast.12 Data from key trials reported IGA success, defined as IGA of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) plus ≥2-point improvement from baseline in 80% of participants, with some reaching IGA success as early as weeks 2 and 4.12 Pruritus, measured via the WI-NRS, improved as early as 48 hours after application. These results are in-line with other first-line therapies (Table 3).

With the continual push for more effective and safer therapies, roflumilast appears to be a useful agent added to the SD armamentarium.

Conclusion

Due to its minimal AEs and favorable tolerability, the novel roflumilast 0.3% foam offers a safe treatment for the erythema, scaling, and pruritus caused by SD. Its once daily application and potent formulation provides a convenient and effective treatment for SD. This treatment highlights the importance of continued advancement in the development of innovative therapies for SD as it is essential to improve outcomes and enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by this condition.

References



  1. Clark GW, Pope SM, Jaboori KA. Diagnosis and treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Feb 1;91(3):185-90.

  2. Chang CH, Chovatiya R. More yeast, more problems?: reevaluating the role of Malassezia in seborrheic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Mar 12;316(4):100.

  3. Zampieron A, Buja A, Fusco M, et al. Quality of life in patients with scalp psoriasis. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;150(3):309-16.

  4. Dessinioti C, Katsambas A. Seborrheic dermatitis: etiology, risk factors, and treatments: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):343-51.

  5. Jackson JM, Alexis A, Zirwas M, et al. Unmet needs for patients with seborrheic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Mar;90(3):597-604.

  6. Ferček I, Lugović-Mihić L, Tambić-Andrašević A, et al. Features of the skin microbiota in common inflammatory skin diseases. Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 14;11(9):962.

  7. Adalsteinsson JA, Kaushik S, Muzumdar S, et al. An update on the microbiology, immunology and genetics of seborrheic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2020 May;29(5):481-9.

  8. Saunte DML, Gaitanis G, Hay RJ. Malassezia-associated skin diseases, the use of diagnostics and treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Mar 20;10:112.

  9. Li H, Zuo J, Tang W. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Oct 17;9:1048.

  10. Schafer PH, Parton A, Capone L, et al. Apremilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor with regulatory effects on innate immunity. Cell Signal. 2014 Sep;26(9):2016-29.

  11. Zirwas MJ, Draelos ZD, DuBois J, et al. Efficacy of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, in patients with seborrheic dermatitis: a double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 2a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jun 1;159(6):613-20.

  12. Blauvelt A, Draelos ZD, Stein Gold L, et al. Roflumilast foam 0.3% for adolescent and adult patients with seborrheic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 May;90(5):986-93.

  13. Zoryve: uses, dosage, side effects & warnings. Drugs.com [Internet]. Last updated July 11, 2024. Available from: https://www.drugs.com/zoryve.html

  14. DiRuggiero M, Mancuso-Stewart E, DiRuggiero D, et al. New non-steroidal topical therapies for inflammatory dermatoses-part 3: roflumilast. Skinmed. 2023 Sep 29;21(4):264-8.

  15. Stratigos JD, Antoniou C, Katsambas A, et al. Ketoconazole 2% cream versus hydrocortisone 1% cream in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. A double-blind comparative study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Nov;19(5 Pt 1):850-3.

  16. Kose O, Erbil H, Gur AR. Oral itraconazole for the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis: an open, noncomparative trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005 Mar;19(2):172-5.

  17. Zisova LG. Fluconazole and its place in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis–new therapeutic possibilities. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2006;48(1):39-45.

  18. Unholzer A, Varigos G, Nicholls D, et al. Ciclopiroxolamine cream for treating seborrheic dermatitis: a double-blind parallel group comparison. Infection. 2002 Dec;30(6):373-6.

  19. Braza TJ, DiCarlo JB, Soon SL, et al. Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for seborrhoeic dermatitis: an open-label pilot study. Br J Dermatol. 2003 Jun;148(6):1242-4.

  20. Peña SM, Oak ASW, Smith AM, et al. Topical crisaborole is an efficacious steroid-sparing agent for treating mild-to-moderate seborrhoeic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Dec;34(12):e809-12.

  21. Goldust M, Rezaee E, Masoudnia S, et al. Clinical study of sertaconazole 2% cream vs. hydrocortisone 1% cream in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. Ann Parasitol. 2013;59(3):119-23. PMID: 24881281.

  22. Ortonne JP, Lacour JP, Vitetta A, et al. Comparative study of ketoconazole 2% foaming gel and betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% lotion in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis in adults. Dermatology. 1992;184(4):275-80.

  23. Ramirez RG, Dorton D. Double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study of fluocinolone acetonide shampoo (FS shampoo) in scalp seborrhoeic dermatitis. J Dermatol Treat. 1993; 4(3):135‐7.

  24. Pirkhammer D, Seeber A, Hönigsmann H, et al. Narrow-band ultraviolet B (ATL-01) phototherapy is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with severe seborrhoeic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2000 Nov;143(5):964-8.

  25. Rathod DG, Muneer H, Masood S. Phototherapy. 2023 Feb 16. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563140/


Purchase Article PDF for $1.99

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM THIS ISSUE