Mohamad R. Taha, BSA1 and Stephen K. Tyring, MD, PhD, MBA2,3

1School of Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Bryan, TX, USA
2Center for Clinical Studies, Webster, TX, USA
3Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Health and Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Abstract:
Prurigo nodularis and atopic dermatitis are chronic, inflammatory skin conditions characterized by significant pruritus that disrupts daily life. They also involve dysfunction of the T-helper 2 immune response, leading to the over secretion of interleukin-31 (IL-13) in the dermis and serum. Nemolizumab is a new IL-31 receptor antagonist that has shown high efficacy in the treatment of prurigo nodularis (PN) and atopic dermatitis (AD) in multiple phase 3 trials, with a good safety profile. A brief overview of PN and AD including highlights of the findings from three trials of nemolizumab in treating these disorders will be presented herein.

Keywords: atopic dermatitis, interleukin-31, nemolizumab-ilto, prurigo nodularis, pruritus

Introduction

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition characterized mainly by pruritus, leading to a disruption of sleep and daily activities.1,2 The pruritus is often intense, lasting over 6 weeks, and may also present with a burning or stinging sensation.3,4 Diagnosis is primarily made by clinical examination of the lesions and through the patient’s history, revealing clusters of nodules commonly located on the extremities or trunk.3 Biopsy can also help to confirm the diagnosis in unusual cases, which typically reveals hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis and increased fibroblasts.3

PN disproportionally impacts individuals of African ancestry and the elderly, although it can affect patients of any age.4 Men and women are equally susceptible.5 A significant number of patients also suffer from anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation due to the severity of the condition.2,4,5 In 2022, dupilumab became the first US Food and Drug Administration approved treatment for PN.6 Other conventional treatments have typically been less effective, involve off-label uses of medications and mainly aim to reduce itching by targeting the neural and immunologic aspects of the condition.3

Similarly, atopic dermatitis (AD) is also an inflammatory cutaneous disease commonly manifesting with erythema, papules, edema, and crusting.7,8 AD most commonly affects the pediatric population, with 90% of cases first presenting with symptoms under the age of 5 years, persisting with episodical outbreaks in adulthood.8 AD is highly variable in presentation and current management of the condition depends on its severity.7,9 First-line therapy involves the use of topical corticosteroids, along with emollients and regular bathing.9 Systemic therapies are also commonly used, including ciclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil.10 Other treatments include calcineurin inhibitors, crisaborole, rofumilast, ruxolitinib, ultraviolet B phototherapy, and, more recently, dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib, which may be used in more severe or treatmentresistant AD.9

IL-31 Pathway and Mechanism of Nemolizumab

T-helper 2 (Th2) cells are primarily responsible for the release of interleukin-31 (IL-31), with CD4+, CD8+, and mast cells also producing IL-31 in the presence of allergens of pathogens.4,11-13 This leads to the stimulation of eosinophils and contributes to the itching in AD, as well as other inflammatory skin disorders.11 There are multiple proposed mechanisms as to how IL-31 leads to the pruritus in AD and PN, such as the abundance of IL-31 receptors in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of cutaneous sensory nerves.11 IL-31 may also activate receptors present in keratinocytes, which subsequently activate unmyelinated C fibers, leading to pruritus.11 Transient receptor potential cation channels in the DRG and chemokine release by keratinocytes due to IL-31 are possible additional mechanisms.11

Both PN and AD are inflammatory cutaneous conditions that involve impaired IL-31 signaling.4 PN skin lesions form as a result of the chronic scratching induced by immunologic and neural dysfunction.4 Skin biopsy reveals the presence of T lymphocytes, mast cells, and eosinophils that release IL-31, tryptase, and histamine.4 There is also increased nerve fiber density, along with neuropeptides such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in the dermis, which contribute to the pathogenesis of pruritus in PN.3,4 Similarly, IL-31 serum levels increase with higher severity of AD, and gene polymorphisms have been linked with the development of the disease.4,11-13 Nemolizumab is an IL-31 receptor alpha antagonist that has shown potential in treating both PN and AD in multiple phase 3 clinical trials.4 These investigations demonstrated that treatment with nemolizumab reduced itch intensity, improved lesion healing and inhibited Th2 (IL-13) and Th17 (IL-17) cells.4

Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Prurigo Nodularis

A phase 3 clinical trial of nemolizumab in PN enrolled 274 patients, aged 18 years and older, from 68 sites and 9 different countries, for a 16-week treatment period and subsequent 8-week follow-up.5 Patients were selected based on a history of PN for ≥6 months and pruritus classified as severe by the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS).5 This scale ranges from a score of 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch), where a score of 7 or greater is severe and qualified patients for enrollment in the trial.5 Patients were also selected for the presence of 20 or more nodules, and a score of 3 or 4 on the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA), which assesses the severity of the disease on a scale of 0-4 by the type, size and quantity of lesions.5,14 Patients with active AD, neuropathic or psychogenic pruritus, or pruritus due to causes other than PN were excluded from the study.5

183 patients were randomly chosen to receive nemolizumab and another 91 patients were given a placebo.5 Participants were administered an initial dose of 60 mg of nemolizumab, followed by 30 mg or 60 mg based on their starting weight, every 4 weeks over a period of 16 weeks.5 Overall, both groups were similar and balanced prior to treatment; only 4.4% of participants were Black.5

19.7% and 35% of the nemolizumab group achieved almost complete itch relief at 4 weeks and 16 weeks, respectively.5 In the placebo group, 2.2% and 7.7% reported similar itch relief after 4 weeks and 16 weeks, respectively.5 37.2% and 51.9% of patients receiving nemolizumab achieved a decrease in sleep disturbance by 4 and 16 weeks, respectively.5 In contrast, only 9.9% and 20.9% of the placebo group reported a clinically significant decrease in sleep disturbance.5 16 week after treatment, 56.3% of the nemolizumab group and 20.9% of the control group achieved a significant decrease in itch intensity, defined as a 4 or greater point decrease on the PP-NRS.5 Patients who received nemolizumab demonstrated significant improvements in skin lesions, pruritus, sleep disturbance, pain, global disease assessment, quality of life, and anxiety and depression symptoms compared to the control group.5 Improvements in itch, skin lesions, sleep disturbance, and quality of life continued through week 52, with more than two-thirds of patients becoming itch-free or nearly itch-free and 90% reporting clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life.15 Quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), which is composed of 10 questions designed to evaluate how patients perceive the impact of their skin condition on different areas of their life, including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment.5

61.2% of participants that received nemolizumab and 52.7% of placebo experienced at least one adverse event (AE) (Table 1).5 In the treatment group, most AEs were common side effects and included mild AD and headache.5 Peripheral or facial edema and asthma were more common in patients receiving nemolizumab, while infections were more prevalent in the control group.5 One case of bullous pemphigoid was reported in the nemolizumab group, and a case of generalized exfoliative dermatitis was recorded in the placebo group.5 In addition, a higher number of placebo patients required rescue therapy (15.4%) compared to those receiving nemolizumab (4.9%).5 2.2% of patients in each group withdrew from the trial due to adverse reactions.5 Long-term data over a 52- week extended study remained consistent with the safety profiles in phase 3 trials.15

In patients with no history of asthma, 6 of 156 in the nemolizumab group and 2 of 77 in the placebo group had decreased expiratory flow below 80% during the treatment period.5 In those with a history of asthma, 5 of 22 patients receiving nemolizumab showed peak expiratory flow under 80% of the predicted value during the treatment period, however, only 2 of these were confirmed as worsening asthma.5 In comparison, 1 of 13 patients with a history of asthma in the placebo group experienced a peak expiratory flow under 80% of the expected value during the treatment period.5 An increased eosinophil count was reported in 7.7% of the nemolizumab group and 4.4% of the placebo group.5 Moreover, 5.8% of nemolizumab patients developed antidrug antibodies.5

Table 1.

Use of Nemolizumab in the Treatment of Prurigo Nodularis and Atopic Dermatitis - image

Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Atopic Dermatitis

In two identical phase 3 trials of nemolizumab for the management of AD, ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2, 1142 patients over the age of 12 years received 30 mg of nemolizumab (after a loading dose of 60 mg), while 586 participants were given a placebo every 4 weeks over a period of 16 weeks.16 The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), which assesses the surface area of the skin affected by AD and the severity of lesions, as well as the IGA, were used to characterize the severity of AD.16,17 Primary endpoints were defined as an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline and at least 75% improvement in EASI.16 Patients in the nemolizumab group who successfully achieved these endpoints were then randomly reassigned in a 1:1:1 ratio.16 They were to receive either 30 mg of nemolizumab every 4 weeks, 30 mg of nemolizumab every 8 weeks, or a placebo every 4 weeks in a maintenance period.16

In the nemolizumab group, 36% of patients in ARCADIA 1 and 38% in ARCADIA 2 achieved IGA success, compared to 25% (ARCADIA 1) and 26% (ARCADIA 2) of patients in the control group.16 75% improvement in EASI was observed in 44% (ARCADIA 1) and 42% (ARCADIA 2) of patients in the nemolizumab group, compared to 29% (ARCADIA 1) and 30% (ARCADIA 2) of those receiving placebo.16 Improvements in pruritus were observed from week 1 in the nemolizumab group, with additional improvements reported in quality of life, sleep, and a decrease in pain by 16 weeks.16 Additionally, clinically meaningful improvements in itch, skin lesions, and sleep disturbance persisted through week 56 of an extended study.18 Overall, the study showed that a statistically significant proportion of patients with moderate to severe AD achieved clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms of pruritus and inflammation with nemolizumab (Table 2).16

Table 2.

Use of Nemolizumab in the Treatment of Prurigo Nodularis and Atopic Dermatitis - image

In terms of safety, 50% of patients in ARCADIA 1 and 41% in ARCADIA 2 receiving nemolizumab reported an AE, with serious effects occurring in 1% and 3% of patients in each respective trial.16 Worsening of AD was the most commonly reported adverse effect, occurring in a total of 112 patients receiving nemolizumab from both trials, compared to 49 patients in the control group. Worsening of asthma was reported in 1% of patients in ARCADIA 1 and 5% of patients in ARCADIA 2 in the nemolizumab group; however, there was no significant difference compared to those receiving placebo.16 Serious drug-related AEs were rare, reported in 5 patients in ARCADIA 2, and included infection, peripheral edema, eosinophilic colitis, and small intestinal obstruction.16 Additionally, AEs resulting in treatment discontinuation occurred in a total of 24 patients in the nemolizumab group, compared to 6 patients in the control group across both trials.16 Safety results of nemolizumab after 56 weeks aligned with previous findings, supporting its use in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD.18

Conclusion

Nemolizumab demonstrated high efficacy in the treatment of PN and AD in phase 3 trials, yielding marked improvements in symptom control with an overall favorable safety profile.5,16 In the PN trial, a significant number of patients receiving nemolizumab exhibited improvements in pruritus, sleep disturbances, and quality of life based on the DLQI compared to the control group.5 The most common side effects were nasopharyngitis, AD, and headaches.5 In the AD trials, similar improvements in pruritus, sleep quality, and a decrease in pain levels were observed with the most common side effect being worsening of AD.16 Overall, nemolizumab has shown promising results in reducing pruritus and is particularly useful in treating severe or therapy-resistant PN and AD.4,5,16

References



  1. Leis M, Fleming P, Lynde CW. Prurigo nodularis: review and emerging treatments. Skin Therapy Lett. 2021 May;26(3):5-8.

  2. Bewley A, Homey B, Pink A. Prurigo nodularis: a review of IL-31RA blockade and other potential treatments. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Sep 20;12(9):2039-48.

  3. Williams KA, Huang AH, Belzberg M, et al. Prurigo nodularis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):1567-75.

  4. Ständer S, Yosipovitch G, Legat FJ, et al. Trial of nemolizumab in moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):706-16.

  5. Kwatra SG, Yosipovitch G, Legat FJ, et al. Phase 3 trial of nemolizumab in patients with prurigo nodularis. N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 26;389(17):1579-89.

  6. Cao P, Xu W, Jiang S, et al. Dupilumab for the treatment of prurigo nodularis: a systematic review. Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 20;14:1092685.

  7. Ständer S. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1136-43.

  8. Sroka-Tomaszewska J, Trzeciak M. Molecular mechanisms of atopic dermatitis pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 16;22(8):4130.

  9. Frazier W, Bhardwaj N. Atopic dermatitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2020 May 15;101(10):590-8.

  10. Alexander H, Patton T, Jabbar-Lopez ZK, et al. Novel systemic therapies in atopic dermatitis: what do we need to fulfil the promise of a treatment revolution? F1000Res. 2019 Jan 31;8:132.

  11. Dubin C, Del Duca E, Guttman-Yassky E. The IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31 pathways in atopic dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021 Aug 3;17(8):835-52.

  12. Keam SJ. Nemolizumab: first approval. Drugs. 2022 Jul 14;82(10):1143-50.

  13. Kwatra SG. Breaking the itch–scratch cycle in prurigo nodularis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):757-8.

  14. Zeidler C, Pereira MP, Augustin M, et al. Investigator’s global assessment of chronic prurigo: a new instrument for use in clinical trials. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Feb 17;101(2):adv00401.

  15. Kwatra S, Legat F, Reich A, et al. Nemolizumab long-term efficacy and safety up to 52 weeks in the OLYMPIA open-label extension study in patients with prurigo nodularis: an interim analysis. Late-breaking abstract presented at 2024 American Academy of Dermatology Association (AAD) Annual Meeting, March 8-12, 2024, San Diego, CA.

  16. Silverberg JI, Wollenberg A, Reich A, et al. Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. The Lancet. 2024 Aug;404(10451):445-60.

  17. Hanifin JM, Baghoomian W, Grinich E, et al. The Eczema Area and Severity Index—a practical guide. Dermatitis. 2022 May;33(3):187-92.

  18. Thaçi D, Paul C, Papp K, et al. Nemolizumab long-term safety and efficacy up to 56 weeks in ARCADIA open-label extension study in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Late-breaking abstract presented at European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) 2024 Congress, September 25-28, 2024, Amsterdam, Netherlands.


Purchase Article PDF for $1.99